ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN POSTMETHOD ERA
Keywords:
Post-method Pedagogy, ELT, Best Method of Teaching, Language Teaching, Kumarvadivelu, Pedagogy, Methods of Teaching, Eclectic Method, Adaptive PedagogyAbstract
Traditional methods in English Language Teaching (ELT), such as the Grammar-Translation Method and Communicative Language Teaching, have often been rigid and prescriptive, focusing narrowly on specific language skills without adapting to diverse learning contexts. The need for postmethod pedagogy emerged to address these limitations, advocating for a more flexible, adaptive approach that empowers teachers to make informed decisions based on the specific needs of their students and teaching environments. This shift promotes teacher autonomy, learner-centered instruction, and cultural sensitivity, moving beyond the constraints of fixed methods to enhance the effectiveness and relevance of language teaching.
This research paper explores the concept of the Postmethod Era in English Language Teaching (ELT), a paradigm shift that moves beyond the limitations of traditional, prescriptive methods. It critiques the one-size-fits-all approach of earlier methodologies, advocating instead for a flexible, adaptive pedagogy that empowers teachers as autonomous decision-makers. Drawing on key theories from scholars such as Kumaravadivelu, this paper examines the principles of particularity, practicality, and possibility, which emphasize the importance of context-sensitive teaching. Through a comprehensive review of literature and analysis of diverse classroom practices, the paper highlights the impact of the Postmethod Era on both teachers and learners, fostering a more learner-centered and culturally responsive approach to language instruction. It also addresses the challenges of implementing this pedagogical shift, including issues related to teacher training and the balancing of flexibility with coherence in instructional design. The study concludes by discussing future directions in ELT, suggesting pathways for continued innovation and professional development in language education.
Downloads
References
Allwright, D. (2005). "From Teaching Points to Learning Opportunities and Beyond." TESOL Quarterly, 39(1), 9-31.
Bell, D. M. (2003). Method and postmethod: Are they really so incompatible? TESOL quarterly, 37(2), 325-336.
Canagarajah, S. (1999). Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Oxford University Press.
Canagarajah, S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford University Press.
Chen, M. (2014). Postmethod Pedagogy and Its Influence on EFL Teaching Strategies. English Language Teaching, 7(5), 17-25.
Chomsky, N. (1966). Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. Harper & Row.
Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge UP.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). "The Postmethod Condition: (E)merging Strategies for Second/Foreign Language Teaching." TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27-48.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). "Toward a Postmethod Pedagogy." TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537-560.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). A postmethod perspective on English language teaching. World Englishes, 22(4), 539-550.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. Yale University Press.
Prabhu, N. S. (1990). "There is No Best Method—Why?" TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 161-176.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Rivers, W. (1981). Teaching foreign-language skills. University of Chicago Press.
Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. Charles E. Merrill Publishing.
Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Swan, M. (2005). Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied linguistics, 26(3), 376-401.
