Effect of Implementation of 360 Degree Performance Appraisal on Employee Productivity
Keywords:
Employee productivity, 360-degree, Performance appraisal, performance review system, EmployeeAbstract
The main purpose of this research is to investigate the effects of implementation of 360-degree Performance appraisal on Employee productivity. The study examined how a 360-degree performance appraisal system affected worker productivity. Employees that participate in a 360-degree performance review process receive input from a variety of people, including managers, peers, subordinates, and consumers. The purpose of the study was to determine whether this kind of appraisal system increases worker productivity.
According to the study, implementing a 360-degree performance review system increased staff collaboration and communication. The system encouraged candid feedback, which promoted fruitful talks and helped staff members to pinpoint areas that needed improvement.
The research is empirical and explanatory basically based on primary data collected survey. Sample survey size was 256 respondents working in various sectors. Researcher use questionnaire and personnel interview as data collection tool and the collected data were analysed with the help of descriptive statistics and Regression Analysis.
Additionally, the survey discovered that input received had the biggest influence on employee productivity. The motivation, engagement, and job satisfaction of employees who received feedback from a variety of sources, including consumers, were higher, which enhanced productivity. The introduction of the assessment system also enhanced staff cooperation and communication.
Downloads
References
Cascio, F.W. (1995). Managing Human Resources, Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profits. McGraw Hills, New York.
Pieter J. Fourie. (2008). Media studies. Vol. 2, Policy, management and media representation.
Van Scotter, J.R. (2000) Relationships of Task Performance and Contextual Performance with Turnover, Job Satisfaction and Affective Commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 79-95.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00040-6
Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W.C. Borman and Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers
lgen, D. R., & Schneider, J. (1991). Performance measurement: A multi-discipline view. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 71–108). Chichester: Wiley.
llgen, D. R., & Schneider, J. (1991). Performance measurement: A multi-discipline view. InC. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizationalpsychology (Vol. 6, pp. 71–108). Chichester: Wiley.
Frese, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2002). Performance concepts and performance theory. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), Psychological management of individual performance (1. ed., pp. 3-25). (Wiley handbooks in the psychology of management in organizations). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Borman, W.C. and Motowidlo, S.J. (1993) Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Perfor- mance. In: Schmitt, N. and Borman, W.C., Eds., Personnel Selection in Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 71- 98.
Frese, M. (2000). The changing nature of work. In N. Chmiel (Ed.), Introduction to Work and Organizational Psychology (pp. 424-439). Oxford, England: Blackwell
Smither, J.W. (1998) Performance Appraisals: A State of the Art in Practice. Josey-Bass, San Francisco, 132-162.
Armstrong, M. (2009) Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 11th Edition, Kogan Page Limited, London.
Chivers, W. and Darling, P. (1999) 360 Degree Feedback and Organizational Culture. Institute of Personnel and Development, London
Rohan-Jones, R., (2004). 360 Degree Feedback in the Context of Leadership Development in the ADO. (CDCLMS Leadership Paper 1/2004). Centre for Leadership Studies, Australian Defence College, Canberra
Ward, H. (2004) Public Sector Roles in Strengthening Corporate Social Responsibility: Taking Stock. World Bank, Washington DC.
Lepsinger, Richard and Lucia, Antoinette D, (1997). The Art and Science of 360 Feedback. California, US: Pfeiffer Imp of Jossey-Bass Publishers.
O’Herron, P., and Simonsen, P. (1995, May). Career development gets a charge at Sears Credit. Personnel Journal, 74 (5), 103-106
Garger, E. M. (1999, November). Goodbye training, hello learning. Workforce, 78 (11), 35-42.
Callahan, B. (2000, May). Life-long learning pays off. Industrial Distribution, 89 (5), 116.
Bretz, R.D., Milkovich, G.T. and Read, W. (1992) The Current State of Performance Appraisal Research and Practice: Concerns, Directions, and Implications. Journal of Management, 18, 321-352.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800206
Fisher, S. (1989). Homesickness, cognition, and health. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Ruddin, Z. Z. (2005). Employees’ perception on the effectiveness of performance appraisal
Ruddin, Z. Z. (2005). Employee’s perceptions on the effectiveness of performance appraisal system. MBA Thesis. Open University Malaysia
Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1991). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Allyn & Bacon.
Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., & Williams, R. E. (1989). Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.130
Lillian, G. O., Mathooko, P., & Sitati, N. (2011). The effects of performance appraisal system on civil servants. Kabarak University First International Conference, Kabarak
