Reciprocity of Mythology and Literature: A Retrospective study of the Genesis, Development and usages of Myth in Literature and vice versa

Authors

  • Bodar Dipti S.

Abstract

The entire question of man‟s association with civilization has always engaged a position of dominance in the novel too. An enormous epic can be inscribed on a rock or written on a cloud or wind, but a few immense novels spotlight exclusively on man‟s relation with usual forces. The main concern of a novel is unavoidably with the incidental reality, the very web and texture of civilization as it exists or as it used to exist. Almost all the great European, English, and even American scholars are methodically engrossed by man‟s place in the social web and his efforts to refuse or be incorporated by it. Starting with Richardson‟s Pamela, for instance, and Fielding‟s Tom Jones, to Jane Austen‟s Pride and Prejudice. George Eliot‟s Middlemarch, Henry James‟s The Portrait of a Lady, Faulkner‟s Absalom and Saul Bellow‟s Herzog - all are associated with the particulars of personal and social associations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

 Thomas Mann, “Freud and the Future”, Myth and Myth Making ed., Ffenry A. Murray, (Boston: Beacon Press, 1968), p. 371.

 K.K Ruthven, “St Augustine‟s Confessions”, book XI14, Critical Idiom, (London: Metheun and Co., Ltd., 1976), p.l.

 Malinowski, “Symbolism of the Unconscious”, Northrope Frye on Culture and Literature ed., Robert Denham, (London: the University of Chicago Press, 1978), p. 88.

 Gerald A. Larue, Ancient Myth and Modern Man, (New Jesrsey, Prentice Hall, One., Englewood Cliffs, 1975), p.8.

 Bronislaw Malinowski, Myth in Primitive Psychology, (West Port: Connecticut; Negro University, 1974), p. 13.

 Francis Ferguson, The Human Image in Dramatic Literature (New York: Anchor Books Double day and S Company, 1959), p. 161.

 "Myth" in Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. 15, (London: Chicago William Bentan Publishers, 1973), p. 134.

 Warner cited in, Laurence Coupe, Myth, The new Critical Idiom, ed,, John Drakakis. (London and New York: Routledge, 1997), p. 189.

 L. Durkheim cited by William Righter Myth and Literature, (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., 1975), p. 9.

 Mark Schorer, “The Necessity of Myth,” Myth and Myth Making, ed., Henry A. Murray, Op. Cit., p. 355.

 J.G. Frazer, The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion, (London: Macmillan and Co., 1963), p. 72.

 Jung, cited by D.K. Lai, Myth and Mythical concept in O'Neill's Plays, (New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers and distributors, 1992), p. 61.

 St. James, cited in The Golden Bough, Study in Magic and Religion, Op. Cit., p. 54.

 D. K. Lai, Myth and Mythical Concept in O'Neill's Plays, Op. Cit., p. 61.

 Frazer, Golden Bough: Study in Magic and Religion Op. Cit., p. 65.

 Jung, cited by Mark Schorer, “Texts and Motifs,” DAEDALUS, Op. Cit., p. 361.

 Ernest Cassirer, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, trans. Ralpha Menheim, Vol. 11, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957), p. 389.

 Earnest Cassirer, cited in P Lai, Myth and Mythical Concept in O'Neill's Plays, Op. Cit., p. 15.

 Phillip Wheelwright, “The Semantic Approach to Myth,” Myth:A Symposium, ed., Thomas A. Sebeok, (Bloomington: Indiana University, Press, 1968), p. 98.

 Northrope Frye, Fables of Identity, (New York: Harcourt Brace and World, Inc., 1963), p. 15.

 Richard Chase, Quest for Myth, (Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1969), p. 107.

 Gerald A. Larue, Ancient Myth and Modem Man, Op. Cit, p.5

 M.H. Abrams, “Myth” Glossaary of Literary Terms, (Bangalore: Prism Books, 1993), pp. 120-121.

 E.M.W. Tillyard, Myth and the English Mind, (New York: Collier Books, 1962), pp. 11-12.

 Raymond Williams, Drama from Ibsen to Brecht, (London: Chatto and Windus, 1968), p. 220.

 The Foreigner. New Delhi: Hind Pocket Books.

 The Strange Case of Billy Biswas. New Delhi: Asia Publishing House.

 The Apprentice, New Delhi: Orient Paperback.

 The Last Labyrinth. New Delhi: Orient Paperbacks.

 The City And The River. New Delhi: Vision Books, 1990

 R. K. Dhawan, The Fictional World of Arun Joshi, p. 19.

Additional Files

Published

10-08-2018

How to Cite

Bodar Dipti S. (2018). Reciprocity of Mythology and Literature: A Retrospective study of the Genesis, Development and usages of Myth in Literature and vice versa. Vidhyayana - An International Multidisciplinary Peer-Reviewed E-Journal - ISSN 2454-8596, 4(1). Retrieved from http://j.vidhyayanaejournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/343