Sustainable Agricultural Development and Smart Village Strategies for Economic Prosperity and Environmental Conservation in India
Keywords:
Agriculture, Sustainable Practices, Infrastructure, Rural Development, Smart Village, Solar Power, Integrated Water Management, Supply Chain, Economic Growth, Environmental ConservationAbstract
Agriculture is a pivotal contributor to India's GDP and a primary source of employment, playing a critical role in overall economic prosperity. The development of this sector is essential for increasing productivity, boosting farmers' income, and ensuring food security for the growing population. Embracing sustainable practices, improved technology, and robust infrastructure can enhance crop yields, making India more self-reliant in food production. With the majority of the population residing in rural areas, the development of these regions is crucial for national growth. Investments in rural infrastructure, education, healthcare, and employment opportunities can lead to balanced regional development.
Integrating modern technology and sustainable farming practices is vital for enhancing productivity in agriculture. The use of advanced machinery and data-driven farming techniques holds the potential for higher yields and economic efficiency. Improving rural infrastructure, including roads, irrigation systems, and storage houses, along with well-connected APMC yards, facilitates a direct link between consumers and farmers, thereby increasing the income potential for farmers.
Promoting sustainable and eco-friendly agricultural practices is crucial for long-term viability. This approach ensures a balance between economic development and environmental conservation, safeguarding the benefits of agricultural growth against climate change and other environmental challenges.
The study focuses on five comprehensive strategies for the development of a smart village. Strategy 1 involves maximizing irrigated lands by housing farmers in apartments, conserving land for efficient agricultural processing. Strategy 2 focuses on incorporating solar power sources across hilly areas to power the entire village. Strategy 3 revolves around integrated water management for enhanced irrigation. Strategy 4 establishes a direct link between agricultural product consumers and producers. Lastly, Strategy 5 advocates for implementing scientific principles to optimize agricultural yield. These strategies collectively aim to create a sustainable and interconnected ecosystem, fostering economic growth and environmental conservation.
Downloads
References
Evangelos Anastasiou, Athanasios, T. Balafoutis, Spyros Fountas, “Applications of extended reality (XR) in agriculture, livestock farming, and aquaculture: A review Department of Natural Resources Management & Agricultural Engineering”, Smart Agricultural Technology, Volume 3, February 2023, 100105.
B. Schaal, Plants and people: our shared history and future, Plants People Planet 1 (2019) 14–19, https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.12.
G.R. Salmon, M. MacLeod, J.R. Claxton, U. Pica Ciamarra, T. Robinson, A. Duncan, A.R. Peters, Exploring the landscape of livestock ‘Facts,’, Glob. Food Secur. 25 (2020), 100329 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100329.
F.J. Marti-Quijal, F. Remize, G. Meca, E. Ferrer, M.-J. Ruiz, F.J. Barba, Fermentation in fish and by-products processing: an overview of current research and future prospects, Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 31 (2020) 9–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/-j.cofs.2019.08.001.
A. Raza, A. Razzaq, S.S. Mehmood, X. Zou, X. Zhang, Y. Lv, J. Xu, Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: a review, Plants 8 (2019) 34, https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8020034.
M.M. Rojas-Downing, A.P. Nejadhashemi, T. Harrigan, S.A. Woznicki, Climate change and livestock: impacts, adaptation, and mitigation, Clim. Risk Manag. 16 (2017) 145–163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001.
A. Abu Samah, H.A.M. Shaffril, M.F. Fadzil, N. Ahmad, K. Idris, A systematic review on adaptation practices in aquaculture towards climate change impacts, Sustainability 13 (2021) 11410, https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011410.
D. Trivedi, et al., Soft robotics: biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research, Appl. Bionics Biomech. 5 (2008), 520417.
D. Rus, M.T. Tolley, Design, fabrication and control of soft robots, Nature 521 (7553) (2015) 467–475.
A.D. Marchese, R. Tedrake, D. Rus, Dynamics and trajectory optimization for a soft spatial fluidic elastomer manipulator, Int. J. Rob. Res. 35 (8) (2016) 1000–1019.
K. Suzumori, Elastic materials producing compliant robots, Rob. Autom. Syst. 18 (1-2) (1996) 135–140.
G.Z. Yang, et al., The grand challenges of science robotics, Sci. Robotics 3 (14) (2018).
D.D. Damian, et al., Robotic implant to apply tissue traction forces in the treatment of esophageal atresia, in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE, 2014.
Purohit, M. S. (2012). Resource Management in the Desert Ecosystem of Nagaur District: An Ecological Study of Land (Agriculture), Water and Human Resources (Doctoral dissertation, Maharaja Ganga Singh University).
M. Cianchetti, et al., Biomedical applications of soft robotics, Nat. Rev. Mater. 3 (6) (2018) 143–153.
Lam, Q.D., Schmalz, B., Fohrer, N., 2011. The impact of agricultural Best Management Practices on water quality in a North German lowland catchment. Environ. Monit. Assess. 183 (1-4), 351–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-1926-9.
Purohit, S. (2024). Smart solutions for environmental sustainability and climate changes. Journal of Global Resources, 10(01). https://doi.org/10.46587/JGR.2024.v10i01.016
